George Wallace (Two-Disc Special Edition)
George Wallace (Two-Disc Special Edition)
- Based on the book by Marshall Frady, this epic bio directed by the legendary John Frankenheimer, stars Academy? Award nominated actor Gary Sinise as the infamous politician and segregationist George Wallace. Many have portrayed Wallace as a racist but Frankenheimer?s film suggests that it was his lust for power and status that made him bedfellows with racists and one of the most destructive and mo
Based on the book by Marshall Frady, this epic bio directed by the legendary John Frankenheimer, stars Academy® Award nominated actor Gary Sinise as the infamous politician and segregationist George Wallace. Many have portrayed Wallace as a racist but Frankenheimer’s film suggests that it was his lust for power and status that made him bedfellows with racists and one of the most destructive and most hated American politicians of his time. Sinise – who won an Emmy® Award for this performance – brilliantly captures both the corruption and the belated search for redemption. Mare Winningham plays his first wife and Angelina Jolie – in her first major role – his adoring second. Winningham also won an Emmy for her work and the film won
List Price: $ 24.98
Price: $ 4.98
Taking Lives [Blu-ray]
- Angelina Jolie plays FBI profiler Illeana Scott in this edgy cat-and-mouse thriller also starring Ethan Hawke, Kiefer Sutherland and Olivier Martinez and directed by D.J. Caruso (Eagle Eye,Two for the Money). For 20 years an elusive serial killer has assumed his victims identities. But now theres a breakthrough: Scott is assigned to the case and its her job to know what makes a killer tick. But so
Angelina Jolie plays FBI profiler Illeana Scott in this edgy cat-and-mouse thriller also starring Ethan Hawke, Kiefer Sutherland and Olivier Martinez and directed by D.J. Caruso (Eagle Eye,Two for the Money). For 20 years an elusive serial killer has assumed his victims identities. But now theres a breakthrough: Scott is assigned to the case and its her job to know what makes a killer tick. But somehow this killer knows even more about Scott.
List Price: $ 14.98
Price: $ 8.44
George Wallace: from liberal to racist to redemption,
The fighting little judge from Alabama was known as the most liberal judge in Alabama and probably in the South. But one gubernational defeat makes him turn to racism in order to capture the governorship.
Gary Sinise turns in an incredible performance as the governor, he has become one of my favorite actors ever since his equally brilliant performance in “Truman”.
I like the way that this movie doesn’t judge Wallace as good or bad, it leaves that to the viewer. In one scene you can see Wallace commenting on the beating of Civil Rights activists at the Edmund Pettus Bridge saying “This is a victory for US! We turned them back” and you actually think that Sinise as Wallace believes what he’s saying.
The movie presents some historical footage here and there, you can see president Lyndon Johnson and Martin Luther King’s famous “how long?” speech.
It does have a number of flaws though, I’d have liked to see more about election 1968, the way Nixon tried to prevent Wallace from becoming governor in 1970 by sponsoring Wallace’s opponent, the infamous General Curtis Lemay pressconference. And the fictional character Archie isn’t quite pulled off by the director, it strikes me as an anomaly in the movie.
Also it shows Wallace meeting Cornelia, his future second wife at governor Folsom’s inaugural in 1955, this would have made Cornelia about 23 years old in 1972 when in fact she was 31. The reason for that is that George and Lurleen met Cornelia at Folsom’s FIRST inaugural in 1947 and not 1955
The most moving scene is where Wallace is wheeled into the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church (Dr. King’s former church) where he, in front of a stunned black congegation apologizes for his role in black suffering. The authenticity of this scene I found questionable until I read about it in Stephan Lesher’s book “George Wallace American populist”.
But in the end George Wallace the movie is a masterpiece capturing the sentiments of the 50′s, 60′s and 70′s. The late governor’s children are said to have been content with the portrayal.
Was this review helpful to you?
|solid fare for political junkies,
It’s hardly surprising that Ted Turner, a political animal if there ever was one, would turn his TNT productions into a vehicle for politically themed movies. This film, along with “Kingfish” and “Nixon and Kissinger” is the kind of product Turner no doubt loves to sponsor. Those of us who are closet political junkies ourselves, but who may not have the time or inclination to read lengthy biographies of well-known politicos, can at least begin to satisfy our social consciousness jones with these usually worthy efforts.
_George Wallace_ is certainly that–a worthy effort. It does not answer every question I’ve ever had about the man, but it does provide us with a portrait of a very complex, power-hungry individual, one who sacrificed principal for power and who became a symbol of a kind of racism that he did not really fully embrace. At least as seen by scriptwriter Marshall Frady (on whose book this film is based), Wallace had no particular ax to grind with the black community and was primarily a populist who initially sought the support of all the “folks”. One gubernatorial defeat, however, was all it took to convince him that despite his reservations about extremists like the Klan, he would have to play the race card in order to win the governorship of Alabama.
And thereby hangs the tale–or would have if he had not been shot at a political rally in 1972. The film’s take on Wallace is that this event and the intense personal suffering that ensued brought about his eventual personal and, to some extent, political redemption. This may well be so, but writer Frady and director John Frankenheimer do slip significantly in presenting this turn-about. Wallace’s conversion in the film rings too many false notes. I don’t know if Wallace ever spontaneously dropped in on a black Baptist church, for instance, but if he did, it is all the more incumbent on the filmmakers not to portray the event too hamfistedly. Only Gary Sinise’s nuanced performance keeps that scene from becoming an embarrassment. All too often Frankenheimer and Frady seem to be going for the kind of cinematic shorthand found in politically themed films. Conversations become near tracts or simply clunky ways of advancing the political story.
Still there’s no denying Frankenheimer’s ability to get a tough story across. And the actors are generally first-rate.(Only Joe Don Baker as Wallace’s populist mentor winds up going over the top). On the distaff side, Mare Winningham(a subdued and graceful steel magnolia–the kind of role Lee Remick once specialized in) and a fresh on the scene Angelina Jolie give remarkable performances. Clarence Williams III is solid as the (fictional) stoic black trusty who serves the Wallace household for decades. And, of course, a good ol’ boy milieu as presented here always presents juicy roles for character actors. _Wallace_ is full of familiar faces, actors you’ve seen dozens of times before but whose names you’ll struggle to place. They seem to be having a grand old time putting on the accents and affecting the mannerisms of the South.
Still it’s ultimately Gary Sinise’s movie. His ’97 Emmy was richly deserved. He is simply fascinating to watch here. It’s one of those cinematic performances where you’re first reaction is “why did they ever cast him…there’s no resemblance whatsoever…” And in within minutes you forget all that and become so caught up in the performance that you can’t imagine anyone else playing the part.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Powerful And Well-Acted.,
“George Wallace” is one of the great biographical TV movies. It’s superior to Gary Sinise’s previous biographical performance as Harry Truman in HBO’s “Truman.” Here he gives a performance of raw energy and impact. And no wonder, this was directed by one of the masters of filmmaking, John Frankenheimer. “George Wallace” is a powerful film, a study of a man who once burned with hate and then found redemption after suffering a terrible tragedy. The movie is intelligent, intriguing, moving and hard to forget. It not only looks at Wallace, but also at the era in which he lived. But the best effect of the movie comes near the end with the redemption of Wallace. It’s incredible to see him first as a racist burning with hate, stepping in front of a university to prevent blacks from entering, and then being wheeled into a black church to ask for forgiveness. “George Wallace” is a study of power, hate and redemption. Everything is recreated brilliantly and we feel like we are in the era where the film takes place. There is pure style and intelligence here. Frankenheimer brilliantly directs a brilliant script. “George Wallace” is almost on par with Oliver Stone’s “Nixon.” This is great filmmaking, big screen or small.
Was this review helpful to you?
|IDENTITY CRISIS,
Angelina Jolie is to be commended for taking on so many different kinds of characters from her Oscar winning turn in GIRL INTERRUPTED, to the athletic Lara Croft in those two movies, to this suspenseful, if predictable, serial killer thriller. She plays an FBI agent/profiler called in to help the Montreal police in trapping a serial killer. This particular nasty has been killing for over 20 years, and we find out early in the film who he is when he’s a youngster, but what about now? Who has he metamorphosized in to?
Director D. J. Caruso gives us a probable suspect, but it’s really a red herring, and the true identity should be detected early on. That doesn’t spoil the movie, though; it actually makes you feel like a detective because you figured it out.
Along with Jolie’s competent performance, Ethan Hawke does well as artist James Costa; Gena Rowlands gives a good performance as Mrs. Asher; and Kiefer Sutherland, looking a little older and heavier, does a usually good turn as a mysterious neighbor of Hawke’s. There’s a couple of jump out of your seat scares and overall, despite the predictability, TAKING LIVES is a good entry in the ever growing serial killer genre.
Was this review helpful to you?
|Potentially Good Film Ruined By A Lousy Ending!,
“Taking Lives” stars Angelina Jolie as FBI profiler Illeana Scott who is assigned to Montreal, and the case of a particularly vicious serial murderer. The killer has been taking lives for 20 years, since his teens, assuming his victims’ identities with each crime. There’s a line in the movie to the effect that he’s “like a hermit crab – when he grows out of his shell, (home), he moves on.” OK! So it’s not brilliant dialogue, but until we reach the film’s halfway mark it is forgivable. After the 1st hour, or so, this scary, chiller-thriller loses its edge in a serious way. The last scenes are really contrived – just not believable by any stretch of the imagination.
Jolie is her usual sexy self as the loner, fast-track agent from Washington, DC. She is welcomed by her old friend and colleague, Captain Hugo Leclair, (Tchécky Karyo), of the Montreal Sûreté, but is resented by macho detective Paquette, (Olivier Martinez), who is handsome in a surly kinda way. Illeana’s approach to crime solving is extremely intuitive and unconventional, to say the least – but her unorthodox methods get results, and this case is no different. She quickly comes up with some leads that her Canadian counterparts have missed. Then art gallery owner James Costa, (Ethan Hawke), an actual murder witness, steps in to help the detectives. Costa, who has some artistic talent, is able to sketch the suspect. The hunt picks up speed, and the plot begins to twist, turn and occasionally surprise. I had at least one major scare! There’s a decent car chase, a steamy love scene, (super steamy in the Director’s Cut), and an unusual take on Illeana’s character – all pluses.
The cast is excellent. Ms. Jolie is good here and she develops her character well. If you’re an Angelina Jolie fan, you will enjoy her performance. Kiefer Sutherland, Gena Rowlands and Ethan Hawke also bring some bright moments to the screen. I just wonder why all these talented artists agreed to make this film. Director D.J. Caruso made some really wrong turns, which is sad because he had such a great cast to work with, a potentially good plot, and the wonderful scenery of French Canada to assist him toward success.
I was entertained by much of the movie for reasons mentioned above, but the poor resolution soured me on “Taking Lives.”
JANA
Was this review helpful to you?
|Surprised at how good this movie was!,
I must say, “Taking Lives” started out as the usual hum-drum serial-killer thriller, and I wasn’t expecting it to be very interesting but like many others I have seen. Was I wrong! I found it hard to tear myself away, as the movie became more and more interesting as it went along. Angelina Jolie played her part well. Eathen Hawk was great. And the ending, which I thought was predictable, turned out to be quite the contrary. Good Blu-Ray quality. Very good acting!
Was this review helpful to you?
|